open_logo_c_ic

Mosaic Institute

Akaash Maharaj on how the Mosaic Institute is building engagement with different communities during the pandemic.

 

Tell us about the Mosaic Institute. How would you describe its purpose and what makes it unique?

Mosaic is a Canadian charitable institution that advances pluralism in societies and peace amongst nations.  We operate through Track Two Diplomacy, and bring together people, communities, and states, to foster mutual understanding and to resolve conflicts. Our unique contribution to global affairs and inter-cultural understanding is that we begin our work with diaspora communities in Canada, convene them together across the divides of international conflicts, help them understand one another’s perspectives, and in doing so, help them acknowledge our shared humanity.  We then create opportunities for those communities to join hands in common efforts to resolve or at least mitigate conflicts abroad.

For us, success is rarely a question of persuading people to agree with one another on all aspects of bitterly contentious disputes, but instead, to find was to disagree constructively, and to protect one another’s human rights as a way of protecting their own human rights.

We are all navigating the global pandemic in different ways. What’s a key insight from how the Mosaic Institute is responding to the crisis? 

On the one hand, the pandemic has lain bare the extent to which our interests as individuals are inextricably linked to the wellbeing of every other member of society, and that we can not be healthy, prosperous, or successful individuals, unless we build health, prosperous, and successful societies. On the other hand, the pandemic has made it no less clear that those with the least are being called to sacrifice the most, either by continuing to work in public-facing activities that bring high risks and low remuneration, or by being stripped of their livelihoods altogether.

Over the past few months we have seen groups seize this moment of uncertainty to advance racial and economic justice in their communities. How does this relate to your work?

Physical distancing has only increased the appetite for social interactions, especially amongst Canadians who were already isolated or confined by poverty or powerlessness. Mosaic is working to bring such people together, especially across ethnic, cultural, and confessional divisions.  If a community’s hunger for human interaction is at least partially met by other communities from whom they have been historically alienated, this may build bridges of social cohesion and unity between them that could outlast the pandemic.

What’s one big challenge you see Canada’s democracy facing?  How are you working on this challenge, what solutions do you propose?

Discrimination in Canada is often far more subtle than in other countries.  It has learned to speak the language of virtue, even as it practices the most appalling vices.  Public and corporate actors will mouth the words of inclusion, precisely to mask their practice of racial, class, and gender exclusion.  As a result, discrimination in our country is strangely insidious: it strengthens its grip on the body politic, even as many citizens insist that it is an imagined phantom.

Part of the response must be for social-purpose organisations – including Mosaic – to pay no attention to the words or the expressed intentions of public figures, and to instead place our emphasis entirely on a critical assessment of those figures’ actions.  Part of the response must be fostering a culture that rejects the tyranny of low expectations, a tyranny that persuades citizens to mute their criticism of hypocritical political figures, out of fear that a still worse breed of politician would benefit from such criticisms.

Could you share an idea or initiative related to increasing civic engagement or democratic participation that inspires you? This could be related to your work or something you see happening in the sector. 

I have been deeply impressed and moved by the work of our colleagues at the St John Eye Hospital in Jerusalem.  Israeli and Palestinian doctors have pooled their efforts to provide ophthalmic services in Jerusalem, irrespective of the patients’ ethnic or confessional identity or ability to pay.  The core identity of the hospital emphasises our duties to one another, and the fact that we become our better selves by fulfilling those responsibilities.

Tell us about how the Mosaic Institute is making its work more inclusive and building engagement with different communities. Any tips or lessons to share with others in the sector about decreasing barriers to participation? 

There is a surprisingly widespread misconception that online video engagement activities are necessarily more accessible, because they do not require travel.  In reality, virtual barriers can be as restrictive as physical ones: not all communities have extensive access to high speed internet service, to computers, or to quiet work areas.

During the pandemic, the digital divide was exacerbated by the closing of public libraries and schools. We are in discussions with technology firms about the possibility of creating systems to make basic computer equipment available in deprived communities.  We are also examining regulatory options that would compel large telecommunications firms, as a condition of access to the Canadian market, to provide low-cost internet access to Canadians of modest means.

Are there specific asks the Mosaic Institute has for the broader sector — things you need help with, problems you’re trying to solve or wishes you have?

Like virtually all not-for-profit organisations, we are grappling with the fact that funding agencies have embraced project funding models, and abandoned core funding.  We need to find a way to better persuade funders that investing in institutional capacity and resilience is not only productive, but the only effective and efficient way of ensuring that organisations can continue our work at times of crisis and convulsion, when that work is most desperately needed.

 

Mosaic Institute is a Canadian charitable institution that advances pluralism in societies and peace amongst nations.  We operate through Track Two Diplomacy, and bring together people, communities, and states, to foster mutual understanding and to resolve conflict. Over the past ten years, Mosaic has convened Chinese and Tibetan youth leaders, for discussions on peaceful co-existence on the Tibetan Plateau; assembled Sinhalese and Tamil representatives, to create strategies for reconciliation after the Sri Lankan civil war; called together survivors of genocides, to break cycles of trauma; and established programmes in schools and universities, to nurture the next generation of leaders in pluralism. Follow @MosaicInstitute.

 

This is an unprecedented moment for democracy in Canada so we created Sector Spotlight to learn about how leading practitioners are responding to it. Have ideas for our next Sector Spotlight? Get in touch!

Countdown to DemocracyXChange

The countdown is on for DemocracyXChange – Canada’s annual summit which is co-founded by Open Democracy Project and the Ryerson Leadership Lab. Join us as we seize the opportunity to strengthen democracy in the recovery from COVID-19. Pay what you can to access both the Summit and Festival. 

  • Our virtual Summit (October 13-15) will raise critical questions about systemic inequality, the relevance of our public institutions and how we can respond to this global moment with imagination.
  • Our Festival (October 16-22) enables participants to deepen their engagement with program material by attending online workshops, training sessions and events organized by non-profits, associations and community groups. 


Check out our full Summit schedule which features keynotes from Karen Lord, Waubgeshig Rice, Cory Doctorow, Minister Dominic LeBlanc, Sheri Berman, Siyabulela Mandela, Thomas Piketty, Hahrie Han, and Mutale Nkonde

Sessions will also feature important insights from Oren Cass, Elizabeth May, Beverly Jacobs, Colleen O’Manique, David Coletto, Doug Saunders, Eva Salinas, Darcy Lindberg, Michal Rozworksi, Lynette Ong, Matt Stoller, Paul Bailey and many others. 

The Festival includes organizations from across Canada working to enhance democratic engagement from the ground up. Check out events from CIVIX, Massey College, Mosaic Institute, the Institute for Change Leaders, the Democratic Engagement Exchange, Feedback Frames, Canadian Interfaith Conversation, Institut du Nouveau Monde, Centre for Mindfulness Studies, Fair Vote Canada and others. 

Join us for one panel or settle in for the full program: REGISTER

 

Founding Partners

Founder

Co-Presenting Partners

Sponsors

Finding the Place of Religion in Canada’s Democratic Life

A week before the country-wide shut down in response to coronavirus, a small group of MPs, aides, and national representatives of religious groups gathered in a small conference room on the third floor of a Parliamentary building on Wellington Street, Ottawa. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the creation of an All-Party Interfaith Caucus, an entity that could facilitate dialogue between parliamentarians and Canada’s diverse religious communities about areas of mutual interest and concern: reconciliation, poverty, environmental stewardship, hate speech, and other issues. MPs who have been helping to steer this initiative with the support of the Canadian Interfaith Conversation, will be speaking about the role of faith as a vehicle for dialogue at the upcoming DemocracyXChange Summit. 

The most recent Federal election campaign featured discussion of religion primarily as a source of division and polarization. Whether it was the moral positions of the Conservative leader or the debate over Bill 21 in Quebec, religion was seen as a conversation stopper for politicians. It became clear that we need new language and concepts to engage with religion in the public sphere. We often recognize religion as a source of identity, spiritual practice, and deep-rooted articles of faith. These are sources of difference that add to the diversity of our country. They call us to summon the same ethic of inclusion, toleration, and mutual learning that we are applying to other social differences.

As much as Canada’s religions contribute to our diversity, however, they also reinforce our common life in a variety of ways. At an individual level, religious communities help to educate young people to dedicate their lives to the betterment of the world and to serve others. Religion also reinforces the bonds of community ties that help to foster neighbourhood vitality and relationships of social trust. These communities also give rise to institutions, from charities to small businesses, which generate significant public benefits. In other words, Canada’s religions are an important part of the fabric of democratic life. Few would question that religion can be anti-democratic, especially when its leaders promote prejudice, misinformation and fear. Our challenge, then, is to create structures that can reinforce prosocial religion by connecting the insights arising from the teachings and experience of religious communities to processes of democratic deliberation. 

The All-Party Interfaith Caucus is intended to be a mechanism for this kind of democratic action. All-Party groups are informal parliamentary bodies that have become a feature of several Westminster legislatures. They typically bring together backbencher parliamentarians across different parties to work with non-governmental groups on issues of shared concern. As Dr. Paul Thomas has noted, All-Party Parliamentary Groups have proliferated in Canada over the past several decades – often driven by these converging interests. They create opportunities for parliamentarians to develop policy ideas through structured interaction with constituents, community groups, and lobbyists. While many parties also have issue caucuses, All-Party Groups exert a countervailing influence on growing partisanship by bringing together parliamentarians from across the aisle.

On October 15th at 11am ET, three parliamentarians from different political parties will participate in a panel discussion at DemocracyXChange about how faith can be a vehicle for dialogue in an age of partisan polarization. Elizabeth May (Green Party), Garnett Genuis (Conservative Party), and Anthony Housefather (Liberal Party) will discuss how religion can have a positive role in public policy and the best way to engage with a religiously diverse citizenry. I have worked with Dr. John Milloy,  a former Cabinet minister in the Ontario government and the Director of the Centre for Public Ethics at Martin Luther University College, to organize this conversation. Our hope is that the discussion will point to concepts and principles that transcend partisan difference and promotes a space for more robust public dialogue.

We are also planning a follow-up virtual panel with leaders of national religious groups, sponsored by the Canadian Interfaith Conversation and Martin Luther University College, as part of the DemocracyXChange Festival on October 16th.